Re: oops- we've seen the second one before, and it still doesn't credit CCJ...
Posted by Marina Waltz on August 21, 2002 at 19:19:18:
In reply to: Re: oops- we've seen the second one before, and it still doesn't credit CCJ... posted by Catherine Cartwright Jones on August 21, 2002 at 01:21:32:: Actually, I think it peaked a good deal earlier... more like 2000
: BCE.. but we have better records from the the later period, so we
: PERCEIVE that it was peaking then... just because that's what we've
: got material on. When you rebuild city on top of city, for hundreds
: and hundreds of years, the lower levels are harder to evaluate than
: the higher.
True enough! It's also tough to keep up with all the new information
that keeps coming to light. I think most of my reference books are
out of date now, but it's good to be inspired to continue researching
topics of interest.
|Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev.|