Re: Huntington, CA - Not us!
Posted by Maureen on October 1, 2002 at 23:37:30:
I agree that residing in Huntington, CA is not sufficient information
for accusations to begin. Personally I don't think that a hunt is
required. The people who held the fair these folks last attended
know exactly who they are. And, they have complete contact
information. Rather than guessing, I would think that going back to
them and obtaining name, address and telephone number might be more
productive. I would think that they might actually want to play a
proactive role and contact other fair organizers about the problem
the product of this particular vendor has caused. Just the factual
information about the number and nature of complaints should do the
trick. And also, it would seem to me that the fair organizer getting
the complaints now is the most logical one to contact the vendors too.
Complaints to and about the wrong vendor/artist/company won't be
productive. Individual vendors at the fairs are most likely just
that, individuals and not actually part of a "company" other than as
self identified but not as a legal entity. So there is great
likelihood the name of the company is just a made up bogus name used
for the fairs and obtaining vending licenses.
Erkin Art and Huntington, CA is really not sufficient information to
pin point this person/company. That might be why it was given out in
the first place. For the fair organizers to give seemining useful
but ultimately nonidentifying information just sends folks on a wild
goose chase. Better to go back to them and ask them to get real or
wait until more information can be obtained at another time and from
My couple of cents on this.
|Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev.|