oopsPosted by Rose on July 1, 2003 at 04:11:49: In reply to: As Alissa dais posted by Rose on July 1, 2003 at 03:44:44: Don't know what key I hit this time; gotta type slower.As Alissa said, I had thought that the devadasi system once had a different role in Indian society. At that time marriage was not such a great option any way, seeing as women had so little rights and child marriage was the norm. In reality marriage was a financial transaction and might be considered a type of rape by someone else's standards as women became sexual property of a husband they didn't choose. The devadasis were bound by ritual duties to "God" in much the same way other women were bound by homemaking duties to their husbands. But in many ways Devadasis were more liberated because they were at least able to control their own money, recieved some standard of education when other women had none, and never suffered the inauspiciousness of widowhood. Plus they had more freedom of movement, and their children were theirs alone. It was my understanding, that the system began to be disputed when women's roles started to change and several general reforms related to women were being enacted, such as ban on child marriage and sati. The devadasi was part of the old system but did not fit into the new. The devadasi system being practiced today seems to epitomize many of the problems faced by poor, rural women in general such as child marriage with no choice from the woman, being denied education, the stigma of belonging to a low social class, and lack of choices due to abject poverty. The scholar who I best remember talking about these reforms and the devadasis system was a certain Meduri. I should look it up in my notes... I'm looking forward to any other thoughts on the subject, or a different point of view. -Rose
Follow Ups
|
| Post Followup | ||
| Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. | ||