![]() |
CCJ's designs and who elses?Posted by Willowhawk on May 23, 2001 at 22:17:47: In reply to: Catherine's designs on your page?!? posted by xena the info princess on May 23, 2001 at 20:43:56: Do I also see designs that are in Sumitra Batra's and Aileen Marron'sbooks, as well as Catherines? Willowhawk : Excuse me, but the link you provide is to one which uses Catherine's : designs, and I was wondering if you had asked her permission. Some : time ago someone found your site (the *bright yellow and purple* one) : and noticed her designs. They are still there, and still uncredited : - what's up with that? : Oh, and by the way, henna is not a tattoo. I have some tattoos. They : involve a needle entering the top layers of the skin over and over, : creating a permanent design. As several people pointed out below, the : word "tattoo" has to do with this motion. Calling henna a tattoo : misinforms people as to what it is ("does it hurt"? "does it come in : different colors") and, I believe, dishonors the ancient traditions to : which we are all heirs. Different body arts are related, but : maintain their uniqueness. That's why it's incorrect to call henna a : tattoo, just as it's incorrect to call glittery skin stickers : "mehndi". People do it, but people do lots of silly things. : : : Hey all, : : I come to this forum to read about henna, natural of course. : : However, I see that the more posts are not regarding the advancement : : of henna application and usage. It's called negative publicity. This : : black PPD site (I refuse to even call it "henna") is getting more : : hits and purchases because you fools are posting so much about them : : that everyone wants to see it. You can ramble about black PPD as : much : : as you want, get legislation against it in England and all of : Europe, : : there will always be some deranged, profit-oriented freak who will : : supply the demand for black PPD. As a matter of fact, how come it is : : not illegal in the US? All of you that type from US cities, why : don't : : you get legislation passed by the US Congress to ban the use of PPD : : and fine those who do heavily? : : To get back to the subject of my concern, my own interpretation of a : : tattoo, pardon my french and all the dictionaries and encyclopaedias : : in the whole wide world, is AN IMPRINT ON THE SKIN, no matter how : : temporary or permanent it is. Because after all, the ink needle- : : injected "tattoos" are just more permanent than one of henna, by a : : few years. Therefore henna imprints on the skin are nothing else but : : a tattoo, a short lasting one you can over and over again. By this : : rationale, everyone that performs the drawing on someone's body is a : : tattooist. Maybe it is hard to swallow, but the folks out in : : festivals and such places do see henna artists on the same level as : a : : tattooist or the performer of any act/service. Some of us would like : : to elevate themselves by trying to believe otherwise. I apply henna : : on my friends and others for the beautiful smiles they give me, : : nothing else. I do not care about black PPD because I don't use it. : I : : don't even mention it in my design books. I'm not interested in : : surfing the sites that sell it or mention it. : : One last thought on a very personal note, this forum is turning into : : a co-ed sewing circle (thus, the title). : : I hope you enjoyed the thoughts. : : PLUR, : : daniel
Follow Ups
|
![]() |
Post Followup | |
Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. |