![]() |
Re: thank you, Wolfgang, and requestsPosted by Natalie on August 23, 2001 at 06:40:03: In reply to: thank you, Wolfgang, and requests posted by Catherine Cartwright Jones on August 23, 2001 at 02:04:49: I just read your letter. It is very well written and you make so manygreat points! I especially loved this part. :Devotees of Hinduism feel that their deities most approve of offerings presented with hennaed hands. 100% pure henna should be allowed to pious Hindus who feel that their prayers and offerings may be shunned if they cannot present them with hennaed hands: In the following did you mean Zoroastrian? :Hindu, Muslim, Sephardic Jewish, Rom, B'hai, Parsee, Zooasterian, Sikh, Coptic Christian, and Armenian Christian brides all are traditionally hennaed for their weddings. These people make up, at last census, 10,000,000 citizens of the USA. It would be tragic to prevent, by halting the import of 100% pure henna, these brides' joy in celebrating and preserving their wedding traditions! Henna as a wedding tradition dates to 7000 BCE. A tradition that has endured for 9000 years and stretched over 60 countries should NOT be interrupted by a government officials misinformed and poorly reasoned ruling!: I have been searching for some info on Zoroastrian beliefs recently. The local library was no help and I have only found brief mention on the internet. Do any of you know if they allowed women to worship and what thier feeling about women were? You can email me if you do. Thanks, Natalie
Follow Ups |
![]() |
Post Followup | |
Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. |